Ex–NFL Player John Urschel Gave up the Game for a Ph.D.—and a Life—in Math

One recent afternoon in Cambridge, Mass., John Urschel and I strolled along the Charles River on the way to his office at MIT, where he’s pursuing a Ph.D. in mathematics. We were passing some of the MIT athletic facilities when I asked Urschel a seemingly mundane question. Where’s the football field? Urschel’s response was quick: “You’re looking at it.”

Now, I’m no MIT math major. But I’m bright enough to know I was staring straight at a baseball diamond. Such a slip would have been innocent enough, if Urschel hadn’t spent three seasons as an offensive lineman for the Baltimore Ravens.

In the summer of 2017, Urschel announced he was retiring from the NFL, at age 26, to pursue his mathematics doctorate full time. His decision came two days after the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study showing that chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative disease, had been found in the brains of 110 of 111 ex–NFL players examined by Boston University researchers. Yes, the findings factored into Urschel’s decision. But he insists they didn’t tip the scales. He had been thinking hard about stepping away, as he was already taking classes at MIT. Still, the media painted Urschel’s choice as more evidence that smart young pros, fearing brain trauma, were fleeing the game. Urschel’s story proved irresistible: the MIT mathematician had calculated that the NFL just wasn’t worth it.

After I inform Urschel that no, he wasn’t looking at a football field, he smiles. “I just don’t pay attention,” he says. But Urschel doesn’t object when I cite his slip as a signal that he’s left football far behind. Nearly two years after retiring, he says that while he misses the paycheck—who wouldn’t?—he hasn’t felt a single pang of regret on football Sundays, when he’s wrestling with theorems instead of 300-lb. linemen. “It’s a pretty cool life,” he says. “I wake up in the morning, I walk to my office. I think all day.”

Urschel dedicates much of his new memoir, Mind and Matter: A Life in Math and Football—written with his partner, the journalist Louisa Thomas—to espousing the importance of problem-solving. “It’s a strange thing,” says Urschel in the living room of the Cambridge apartment he shares with Thomas and their year-old daughter, Joanna. “Some people will sort of joke about, ‘Oh, I was never good at math.’ But people don’t joke about being illiterate. Being mathematically illiterate is quite a dangerous thing.”

Growing up in Buffalo, n.y., Urschel began his love affair with numbers early. When his attorney mother took him shopping, she’d let him keep the change if he calculated the 8% sales tax before the cashier rang it up. The summer before eighth grade, he audited a calculus class at the University at Buffalo, where his dad, a surgeon, was pursuing a master’s in economics. Soon, the junior high kid was helping college students finish problem sets.

He also fell for football. Urschel writes that when he was in high school, he and his father, who played collegiately in Canada, banged helmets in the backyard. In today’s concussion-conscious world, doctors frown upon this kind of head-to-head contact. Even so, Urschel says, “These are actually some of my fondest moments with my dad.”

Urschel earned a football scholarship to Penn State, where he majored in math. By the time the Ravens selected him in the fifth round of the 2014 NFL draft, he had his master’s degree and had published a paper in a top linear-algebra journal. (Urschel specializes in graph theory, the branch of advanced math that studies the connectivity of networks.) After a rookie season in which he started three games, plus two in the playoffs, he felt ashamed that he was putting off his Ph.D. work until he finished pro football. “I felt like I was selling myself short,” he says. So he applied to MIT’s Ph.D. program and was accepted. The American Mathematical Society named a theorem after Urschel and his co-author. “Let G be a finite connected undirected weighted graph without self-loops …,” the Urschel-Zikatanov theorem begins.

Before the 2015 season, Urschel had suffered a concussion that left him unable to process high-level math for a few months, but he returned to the field. By the summer of 2017, he was weighing his options more closely. He was settling into Ph.D. life, and Thomas was pregnant. Pounding heads seemed unappealing. Then that CTE study was released. Two days later, he informed Baltimore coach John Harbaugh that he was retiring, thinking no one would notice. But his phone rang off the hook. He didn’t go outside for days. “It was one of the most unpleasant moments of my life,” he says.

A couple of years removed, Urschel insists he doesn’t worry that any potential symptoms of CTE—forgetfulness, mood swings, depression—will hinder his career. Sure, as an offensive lineman he absorbed hits to his head. But he points out that just because more than 99% of the brains examined in the study had CTE doesn’t mean more than 99% of all ex-players do. Such studies have a self-selection bias: many players offer up their brains because they think they may be damaged. So how many players does he suspect have CTE? “It’s not epsilon close to zero,” he says. “And it’s not some large constant fraction of 100. You know what I’m saying? It’s bounded away from both.”

Books with titles like Partial Differential Equations in Action and Hierarchical Matrices populate Urschel’s MIT office, along with the usual grad-student fare that fuels late-night research: cans of black beans, sardines and StarKist tuna. Urschel geeks out about the math department’s espresso machine and the equations that fill hallway chalkboards. Math can be as cutthroat as football: Urschel won’t share the subject of his dissertation, lest competition come after it. “But anything on the chalkboard,” he says in the hall, “is fair game.”

Sports teams, which have been staffing up their analytics operations, have come calling with offers. But academic life holds much more appeal. When I ask him to explain the math of the two-point conversion, he does with reluctance. “This is as low-level as you get,” he says. He draws a series of probability tree diagrams in chalk: let’s just say if your team’s down 14 with five minutes to go and scores a touchdown, the coach needs to go for two.

Urschel would rather spend his time promoting math. He visits classrooms around the country. In early May he spoke at the National Math Festival in D.C. He recommends books about calculus via his Twitter feed. “I could obsess over a problem for days, for weeks, thinking of nothing else, the way someone might obsess over a girl,” he writes in his own book. “But no girl I had ever met brought me the singular sense of engagement that I got from proving something difficult.”

He also wants athletes, at all levels, to know they don’t need to compromise their intellect. “The United States, more than any other culture, has the strange marriage of athletics and academics,” Urschel says. “I thought it was important to show that this is something that really can co-exist.” He’s 350 miles from Baltimore but might as well be 35,000. Urschel turns off the office lights, and heads home to eat dinner and finish up some work. More equations await.

Sports – TIME


Canadian province considers mandatory annual math tests for all public school teachers: reports

A Canadian province is considering a measure that would require teachers to pass an annual math test even if math is not the primary subject they teach as part of an initiative to boost student performance in the subject.
FOX News


http://www.acrx.org -As millions of Americans strive to deal with the economic downturn,loss of jobs,foreclosures,high cost of gas,and the rising cost of prescription drug cost. Charles Myrick ,the President of American Consultants Rx, announced the re-release of the American Consultants Rx community service project which consist of millions of free discount prescription cards being donated to thousands of not for profits,hospitals,schools,churches,etc. in an effort to assist the uninsured,under insured,and seniors deal with the high cost of prescription drugs.-American Consultants Rx -Pharmacy Discount Network News



Click today to request your free ACRX discount prescription card and save up to 80% off of your medicine!


Please help American Consultants Rx achieve it’s biggest goal yet of donating over 30 million discount prescription cards to over 50k organizations in an effort to assist millions of Americans in need. Please click here to donate today!

Should You Put Extra Income Toward Debt or Retirement? We Do the Math

The age-old question: Should you prioritize paying off debt or investing?

Or, if you’re ambitiously trying to do both: To what extent should you prioritize each?

The answer isn’t the same for everyone. It’s easy from the outside to say, “Don’t invest until you’re debt-free.” Or, “The market has higher returns than your loan interest, so why would you pay it off?”

However, it comes down to what you feel comfortable with. (I know — lame answer, right?)

But if you’re a numbers person — and because my editor won’t let me end this post right here — let’s dive into some specific figures to help you decide whether to prioritize investing while paying off debt.

Should You Pay Off Debt or Invest?

There are a lot of factors to consider: interest rates, amount of debt, income, expenses, etc.

But to put money toward either, you must have a surplus after your monthly expenses that you can put toward retirement or debt.

The quickest way to do that is to lower your expenses and/or increase your income. But even after that, people will have differing surpluses based on where they live, their life situations, etc.

Someone who has enough surplus to pay off $ 50,000 in two years should think about investing differently than someone who plans to take 10 years to pay it off.

So let’s look at the fictional examples of Adam and Sharon. Both are 25. Both have $ 50,000 of debt and are paying an average interest rate of 6.45%.

Adam has a sizable surplus. He plans pay off $ 50,000 in two years with the help of his wife’s income, side hustling and cutting back expenses.

But Sharon has very little surplus. So she plans to pay off her $ 50,000 in 10 years.

Why Adam Might Want to Invest While Paying Off Debt

If Adam sticks with his plan to put his entire surplus toward paying off his debt rather than investing, he’ll make 24 payments of about $ 2,226 and pay just over $ 3,400 in interest.

But suppose Adam opts to use part of his surplus to max out his Roth IRA by investing $ 6,000 a year. He’ll end up making 32 payments of $ 1,726, rather than 24 payments of $ 2,226. He’ll pay an extra $ 1,000 in interest.

But he’ll have an extra two years of Roth IRA contributions —  $ 12,000 — invested.

That $ 12,000 alone compounded over 35 years in a market seeing 6% return will turn into $ 92,000 by the time Adam is 62.

Even though he’ll pay an extra $ 1,000 in interest, because Adam is paying off his loans so fast,  taking advantage of some investing while paying off his debt would net him an extra $ 90,000 in the long run.

… but Sharon Should Focus on Getting Rid of Debt

If Sharon pays back her $ 50,000 debt over 10 years, she’ll make 120 payments of about $ 570. She’ll pay a total of around $ 18,000 in interest.

If she starts maxing out her Roth when she becomes debt-free — in 10 years at age 35 — she’ll have contributed $ 30,000 by age 40. If she continues contributing $ 500 per month from age 36 to 60, assuming 6% growth, she’ll have $ 304,000 at age 60.

If Sharon decides she doesn’t want to wait to invest and puts $ 50 per month toward her Roth IRA, she’d end up making 137 payments of $ 520 and paying over $ 2,700 extra in interest on her debt. She’ll have contributed $ 6,850 in her Roth over that time. At 6% growth, the balance would be $ 8,357 by the time she’s debt-free.

That’s a growth of $ 1,507 in her Roth at the expense of an extra $ 2,700 in interest paid on debt.

If she then starts contributing $ 500 per month to her Roth at age 38 through age 60, she’d have $ 290,000 at that point — $ 14,000 less than if she’d focused on paying off her debt instead of investing during that time.

Of course, no financial situations will be the same as Adam and Sharon’s are.

The most valuable lesson from these scenarios is that you have to run the numbers for your own situation.

You might not stick with the strategy you begin with. If you’re not investing, you might spend a few months refining your budget and getting used to going out less. Maybe you’ll then find that you have extra money to invest or that you can pay off your debt much quicker than you anticipated.

Alternatively, you might invest for a while and then encounter something that cuts your income. So it might make sense to take a break from investing in the short term.

As a rule of thumb, if you can max out an IRA and still be debt-free in four years or less, it may be worth paying a little extra in interest to start investing. If your budget is too tight, or your interest rates are hovering at or above the average rate of return we use to calculate retirement savings — 6%-8% — then don’t stress about your IRA.

But remember: As long as you’re doing wise things like saving, paying off debt and investing, you’re already on the right track.

This article contains general information and explains options you may have, but it is not intended to be investment advice or a personal recommendation. We can’t personalize articles for our readers, so your situation may vary from the one discussed here. Please seek a licensed professional for tax advice, legal advice, financial planning advice or investment advice.

Jen Smith is a staff writer at The Penny Hoarder. She and her husband paid off $ 78,000 of debt in less than two years on two less-than-average salaries. She gives money saving and debt payoff tips on Instagram at @modernfrugality.

This was originally published on The Penny Hoarder, which helps millions of readers worldwide earn and save money by sharing unique job opportunities, personal stories, freebies and more. The Inc. 5000 ranked The Penny Hoarder as the fastest-growing private media company in the U.S. in 2017.

The Penny Hoarder


Sam's Club Membership Offer

White math teachers treat students differently in predominantly black schools

White math teachers in predominantly black middle schools are more likely to respond negatively to students’ behavioral or academic issues – and this may have long-term negative consequences for student performance, according to a new study that highlights the need to recruit more black teachers. The study, published recently in Harvard Educational Review, observed video data collected from 2009-2011 of 25 mathematics classrooms in middle schools that were either predominantly white or black.
K-12 Education News — ScienceDaily


Our one-of-a-kind bestselling personalized alphabet book makes learning the ABCs fun, especially when your child sees their face and hears their name throughout their very own book!

Intellectual curiosity and confidence help children take on math and reading

Children’s personalities may influence how they perform in math and reading, according to a new study.
K-12 Education News — ScienceDaily


Our one-of-a-kind bestselling personalized alphabet book makes learning the ABCs fun, especially when your child sees their face and hears their name throughout their very own book!

The fuzzy math of October’s ‘new jobs’ data

I think the employment report Friday will be stronger than the “experts” expect. I always put the word “expert” in quotes when it comes to the jobs report because nobody is an expert. Everyone is a guess-pert. Me too. Only I think I know a secret regarding this job report, which is crucial because it…
Business | New York Post